Killing Sacred Cows Blog

The following are tips that one can do to increase cash flow and identify resources more productively to be applied towards your economic well-being and/or Soul Purpose.  Remember, that one's perspective is more important than just going through the motions. The key is discipline to be productive with the money freed up rather than spending it on consumptive or destructive items. Each of these points can be utilized to recapture lost dollars, but can also be abused in a way that could lead to financial misery.

 1. Track income and expenses and eliminate expenses that are destructive to your human life value and Soul Purpose.  This could include overdraft charges, excessively eating out, monthly charges for memberships that aren't being utilized, etc.

 2. Look to getting some food items by finding deals from local "grocery gurus."  Warning - do not just buy things because they are on sale. However, if you are going to purchase certain items anyway, then see if you can capitalize on special sales. For those in Utah, the web link for weekly specials is http://www.pinchingyourpennies.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=62 (Yes, I do think the name of the website is very ironic considering the conversation).

 3. Increase tax exemptions.  If you receive a tax return each year, increase exemptions to receive it on a monthly basis rather than yearly. Consult with your tax accountant to know what number is optimal.

 4. Temporarily pay minimum payments on credit cards and other loans.  If you are making extra principal payments or anything beyond the minimum payments, identify that as a resource. If you do not know what else could be more productive than paying down high interest credit cards, then please put it towards your credit card payments.  If you are paying extra on your loans, be willing to question if that is the highest utility of your dollars.

 5. Consider stopping contributions to 401(k)'s and IRA's.  This may be an obvious choice considering the volatility of the markets. Most would have been better in money market accounts over the last few years, if not the last 10 years.

 6. Sell off any unutilized assets.  This may be time to clean your clutter and get rid of things that are only taking space but providing no utility in your life. Look to sell these off or donate to increase tax exemptions.

 7. Get rid of duplicate insurances.  If you have life insurance tied to certain loans, it will likely be more cost efficient to get an individual term policy. Most life insurance offered through banks or credit unions are expensive for the coverage and benefit the banks more than the client.

 8. Consolidate, refinance, or negotiate lower interest rates on loans.  Many of us can call our credit card companies and ask if they will lower the current interest rates on credit cards or other loans. Try it!  You may be surprised.

For more details and future podcasts on the subject, go to the Fire Your Financial Adviser website.

With my "Fire Your Financial Adviser" seminar and our Producer Power Hour podcast this week, I wanted to address a topic that I feel is grossly misunderstood.  When I was a traditional financial adviser, I would rattle off some assumed 2000 Bureau of Labor Statistics that came out with a longitudinal report that studied where 25 yr olds in 1960 were in 2000.  It showed 29% of 65 year olds deceased, 66% totally dependent on others or still working, 4% financially independent, and 1% wealthy.  By the way, I have never seen any government source confirm these numbers, but I have seen many financial institutions and network marketing companies quote it.  In fact, in my presentation, I would have a tagline that said "People don't plan to fail, they only fail to plan."  This was what I used to convince others to take action and do business with me.  However, even if those numbers were accurate, hadn't more than 5% of Americans implemented some sort of retirement products during their life, like 401(k) and IRA's, some with financial advisers?  Weren't many of these "Prime lifers" born in 1935 strict savers because of the influence of the Great Depression?

 

The Tragic Truth

The reality is much worse.  According to the National Centre for Health Statistics, a 25-year old only has a 16% chance of death before age 65, not 29%.  Of the surviving, the 2000 Bureau of Labor Statistics says that 24.4% of 65-69 year olds were still working and 66% of them depend on Social Security to provide at least 50% of  their income (22% are totally dependent).  The median household income for those 65 and older was only $33,802 in 2002.  In addition, the 2000 U.S. Census said that this aging population had a net worth of $108,885.  However, $85,516 was home equity leaving a measly $23,369 for retirement.  If you read my blog on hidden 401(k) fees (August 8^th), you would also notice that the average balance in a 401(k) for 65 year olds is only about $60,000.  Could you live like that for one year?  Two years?  Ten years?  How about 25 more years? 

 

The Cause

There are many factors contributing to this, but let's address some of the most overlooked. First, most financial planners will quote some "average" return in the markets that someone can likely count on for the long haul.  However, the "actual" return often is different.  See diagram below.

 

This is a pretty drastic example, but it proves the point that the number an adviser or planner puts in the calculator will never match up to reality.  From 1965 to 2004, the S&P 500's (stock market) performance was an 11.74% "average" rate of return but the "actual" return was 10.4% per year.  You may think that 1.34% makes little difference; however, after 40 years, your money is less by about 38%!  This doesn't even include fees that they never factor into your rate of return.  If your fees totaled about 1.25% per year, you would see that number cut by another 36%!  This would mean that you would actually only have about 39% compared to what a financial calculator would tell you based on the average rate of return!  Therefore, in this S&P 500 example, if you were expecting $1 million when you retire, even if it performs how it is supposed to, you would only have about $390,000.  Would you be disappointed?  How would that affect the income you were hoping for?  What if you had to pay taxes on that disappointing figure as well?  How much would $390,000 really be worth in 40 years given the actual inflation rates, including health care, as well as keeping up with certain technological changes and so forth?  To see what other factors do to your money, I would suggest listening to our August 27^th podcast on http://www.producerpowerhour.com/ or registering to attend Part 2 of my seminar/webinar at http://www.fireyourfinancialadviser.com/.  I will further illustrate how a positive ACTUAL rate of return of 12% could become a negative return in reality.

 

The Solution

It's simple.  Get further educated on leveraging the assets you have.  One cannot expect to get different results by believing the same things about investing as everyone else.  Misunderstood concepts, like some that were previously mentioned, are contributing to the dilemmas and drain on Social Security.  To hear more on this subject, check out http://www.fireyourfinancialadviser.com/ or http://www.freedomfasttrack.com/.   

Sandwiched between the latest "Twilight" vampire book and Obama-bashing tome on Amazon.com is the No. 11 ranked "Killing Sacred Cows," financial advice by entrepreneur Gunderson.

Click Here to Read the Full Article

| Book Review | Response #1 |

In a recent review in the St. Petersburg Times, personal finance editor Helen Huntley writes, "[Killing Sacred Cows] makes some good points. I agree that you need to take responsibility for your own financial success and you should invest in yourself and your money-making potential. However, the main purpose of the book seems to be to convince you to cash out your 401(k) -- he doesn't mind that you have to pay income tax and possibly a 10% penalty -- and pay Gunderson to show you how to manage your money. If you 'apply' for his program and you have enough money, you just might be accepted!"

We appreciate this perspective because it brings out three valuable things to discuss and clarify: 1) The primary focus and main purpose of the book, 2) Garrett's position on what you should do with your 401(k), and 3) The purpose of Garrett's "program" in question (the Financial FastTrack process that qualified participants of the 401(k) Hoax Challenge experience) and the reason behind the application process.

This post will deal only with the first point, and the second two will be discussed in subsequent posts. And none of these posts are meant to single out Helen Huntley; we simply raise these points because they are common points, indicative of typical perceptions about the book and its message.

 

The Main Purpose of Killing Sacred Cows

While Mrs. Huntley graciously agrees with the book's focus on personal responsibility and investing in oneself, her perception of its main purpose is reversed; what she mentions as "good" points (personal responsibility/investing in oneself) are the main points, and what she states as the "main" point (detailing the risks with 401(k)s) was a good point taken out of context. It's an understandable mistake, especially when one hasn't read the entire book, as Helen admits in her review.

As stated in the Introduction (pg. xvi),

"The purpose of this book is to train your mind and help you to cultivate the ability to be able to see through the myths that limit wealth creation. If this is accomplished, you may well experience a productivity breakthrough on an unprecedented scale...

"My purpose isn't so much to identify and answer every myth for every reader as it is to just get readers thinking about the rhetoric, propaganda, and traditional 'logic' that we're fed through the financial media."

Wanting to give her the benefit of the doubt, Mrs. Huntley's remarks made me wonder if perhaps we don't emphasize enough personal responsibility, stewardship, investing in oneself, and Soul Purpose, and if we over-emphasize the problems with 401(k)s.

Not wanting to go on gut feelings and knee-jerk reactions -- as those who are entrenched in financial myths often do -- I took a scientific approach, did a lengthy and in-depth search of the book, and extracted the following data on the major concepts that we focus on. The appearances of the words that I highlight below were only counted if they were in the proper context. (In other words, I could have counted much more, but I wanted to be as objective and fair as possible.)

In the context that I speak of, the word "responsibility" appears 77 times in the book, with 22 uses of the variation "responsible." "Stewardship" is used 30 times; "steward" 20 times. We speak of "Soul Purpose" on 124 occasions throughout the book. And most importantly, 61 times we use variations of the word "invest" in the context of teaching that the best investment one can make is an investment in themselves through education. The total uses of each of these words and phrases in their proper context -- which together represent our primary focus -- comes to 334.

Constrast that to just 78 mentions of "401(k)s."

(I eliminated all occurences of these words and phrases that were not relevant to the actual content of the book, such as references in the table of contents or the index.)

Clearly, something went wrong with this reviewer's analysis, yet it provides an excellent opportunity to illustrate the power that financial myths can have over us -- when subject to the myths we see only what we want to see. We see the things that coincide with our current beliefs, and casually reject anything that challenges our beliefs. Since 401(k)s are so popular, anything that challenges them will stick out much more than the things with which we agree, or think we already know.

As we learn in the Introduction of Killing Sacred Cows (page x),

"It's human nature to relate things that we are unfamiliar with back to the things that we are already familiar with, or with the things that we think we know. But what if the things we think we know are false, or at least misguided? How can we make sense of new things when our frame of reference is distorted or not founded in truth? One of the most critical steps we can take toward financial freedom is to accept the possibility that what we though to be true may be completely false, and that there are infinite truths we have yet to learn."

The main purpose of Killing Sacred Cows is not to convince any individual reader to cash out their 401(k). In fact, such a direct exhortation is not even a purpose of the book. We completely agree with Helen Huntley that to make such a blanket recommendation -- without knowing the context of the lives of individual readers -- would be highly irresponsible and inappropriate.

If any of our readers have taken this to be the core message of the book, we stress that it was not our intention. Targeting the 401(k) was a way to highlight the importance of self-reliance, responsibility, and stewardship -- not to make a specific financial recommendation to readers.

While we do, quite strongly and in no uncertain terms, detail the inherent dangers of 401(k)s, qualified plans, and the accumulation theory of wealth creation, we never once recommend to any reader that they should liquidate their qualified plan. (This will be discussed in the next blog post.)

The main purpose and primary focus of Killing Sacred Cows is to teach that individuals must take personal responsibility for their prosperity, be wise stewards over their assets and resources, invest in themselves, and live their Soul Purpose. It is to teach people that they are their most important investment -- not products, techniques, or strategies. It is to teach that what happens within a person determines what happens in their external world. It is to detail universal, timeless principles of wealth creation. It is to teach that these things are far more important than -- and determine the success of -- financial products, techniques, and strategies.

This is contrary to much of the traditional financial services industry which teaches people that the right financial products are what matter. Such advisors often recommend products without knowing the full context of their client's lives. We're taught that just throwing money into mutual funds and qualified plans and letting them sit for 30 years -- without knowing what they're doing, where the money is going, who is managing it, how to control it, and how it's creating value in the marketplace -- is all that's needed to make people's retirement dreams come true.

Garrett's point is that people need to take a step back from that flawed approach, invest in themselves, consider every angle, know what they're doing before they invest, and invest based on a macroeconomic plan that takes every aspect of their financial situation into consideration. People must stop believing that financial products -- such as 401(k)s -- have intrinsic value and that people hold the only intrinsic value.

| Book Review | Response #1 |

Join the Killing Sacred Cows Group on Facebook For Updates and Discussions

By Chris Miles

I have often heard many well-intentioned Americans tell me that they feel they are on track to their retirement goals merely because they have been saving a good amount in their 401(k)'s or similar qualified plans. Many believe this is their only option.

My purpose is to shed light on a critical factor that is one of the causes for dramatic disappointment to our 76 million Baby Boomers now entering retirement. This covert killer can leave one with LESS THAN HALF of the money when you retire than the financial calculators will show you. Worst of all, no one would never know why because the 401(k) providers are not required to disclose it. This lurking enemy is commonly referred to as "fees."

Hidden fees are one of the most misunderstood components of a 401(k). According to 2007 AARP survey, 83% of respondents said they did not know what fees they were charged, many of whom believed that there were no fees. The reason there is so much confusion is because the disclosure of fees are not required by law. In fact, if they are disclosed, they are often buried several pages in a document called "Statement of Additional Information." At times, it is nearly impossible to even get the information from the 401(k) providers.

According to the US Dept. of Labor, 17 different types of fees can be applied to any 401(k) plan. Many of these fees are 12b-1 fees, soft dollar fees, brokerage fees, redemption fees, shelf space fees, etc. that are sometimes combined into a single fee called a "wrap fee." The combination of these fees can be over 2% per year! This could cut someone's retirement balances by more than half of the expected balance even if they get a certain projected rate of return and make the employer match obsolete. This occurs because fees are not factored in the fund's historical performance charts that many view in the prospectus.

Some fees are so excessive that there are class action lawsuits against the 401(k) providers. One lawsuit in Washington State has a fund that charges 12.17% in fees each year!

Fees are not inherently bad but ignorance is not bliss when time is no longer on one's side. How are these fees affecting your retirement? What could happen if these fees are charged as your balance is declining? Do you realize that an annual fee as small as 1.35% can cut your end balance in half after 40 years of accumulation?

I invite you to watch this video to learn more about this critical issue.

Join the Killing Sacred Cows Group on Facebook For Updates and Discussions